Content
Nexo has finally explained how it plans to stay in Europe, and the answer is not a license. In a statement published July 28 from Munich, the platform — which ranks itself among the world’s three largest centralized crypto lenders, with more than $7 billion in client assets — said it operates across the European Economic Area through two MiCA-licensed partners: Tangany, a BaFin-regulated custodian holding client assets, and DLT Finance, a MiCA-authorized and MiFID II-licensed brokerage executing trades. Nexo itself holds no crypto-asset service provider authorization, appears nowhere on ESMA’s register, and its announcement — headlined as a reaffirmation of compliance — does not mention that fact once.
The timing explains the framing. The statement arrives four weeks after July 1, the day MiCA’s transitional period expired across the last major EU jurisdictions and unlicensed platforms lost their legal basis to serve European clients. Through the spring, consumer-facing trackers and industry media had listed Nexo among the prominent names without a CASP authorization, some openly advising European users to migrate before the deadline. Nexo’s answer, delivered “at the end of a robust testing phase” in the words of chief product officer Yasen Yankov, is that the deadline was never its problem: the regulated services its European clients consume are provided by companies that do hold the licenses.
How The Licensed-Partner Model Actually Works
The structure Nexo describes splits the MiCA-regulated layer of its business between two German firms. Tangany, a Munich custodian with more than €3 billion in assets under custody and over 60 institutional clients, provides safekeeping of digital assets. DLT Finance — the brand of Frankfurt-regulated DLT Securities GmbH — provides brokerage for both digital assets and financial instruments, carrying the rare combination of a MiCA authorization and a MiFID II investment firm license. Nexo’s role in the EEA becomes the platform layer: the app, the interface, the product design and the global balance sheet, wrapped around regulated European infrastructure it does not own.
Nothing about the model is improper on its face. Renting regulated rails is how large parts of European fintech already work — DLT Finance and Tangany exist precisely to let global platforms serve EU clients through licensed intermediaries, and both companies’ executives appear in Nexo’s announcement describing the arrangement as a blueprint for others. The consequential shift is in who stands where. For custody and execution, the European client’s regulated counterparty is now the German partner, with MiCA’s protections — asset segregation, conduct rules, local supervision — attaching at that layer. What remains at the platform layer is everything else Nexo sells.
The Products MiCA Does Not Touch
That platform layer is where the compliance claim gets genuinely interesting, because Nexo’s defining products are not crypto-asset services under MiCA at all. The regulation’s service catalogue covers custody, exchange, execution, transfer, advice and portfolio management — but the European legislator deliberately left crypto lending and borrowing outside the framework, along with most yield products. The interest-bearing savings accounts and crypto-backed credit lines that made Nexo a top-three global lender do not require a CASP license because no MiCA license category exists for them; the European Commission is mandated to revisit lending in its review of the regulation, and EU supervisory authorities have flagged the gap in their advice on MiCA’s next iteration.
The irony is difficult to miss. The product class at the center of Nexo’s European offering is the same one that ended its first American chapter: in January 2023, the company paid $45 million in settlements with the SEC and CFTC over its Earn Interest Product, which US regulators treated as an unregistered security, and withdrew from the US market before announcing its return in 2025 under a friendlier administration. In Europe, no equivalent question currently has a venue to be asked in. “Product compliance across the EEA,” the phrase Nexo’s announcement leads with, is accurate in a precise and narrow sense: the products that need licenses have licensed providers behind them, and the products that define the company need none.
A Scale Player That Chose The Rented Route
What the announcement presents as strategy also reads as necessity. Converting to a CASP license has proven brutal even for firms that tried: of roughly 1,200 nationally registered crypto providers operating in the EU before MiCA, about 210 held full authorizations by May 2026, a conversion rate below one in five, and BaFin applications alone run twelve to twenty-four months. Nexo reportedly filed its own MiCA application with Bulgaria’s Financial Supervisory Commission in February 2026 and announced a German-supervised structure in June — but no authorization has followed, and the July 28 statement conspicuously omits any reference to pending applications. Peers of comparable scale — Coinbase, Kraken, Bitpanda, Bybit — took the direct route and hold their own licenses; Nexo enters the MiCA era as the largest platform to publicly embrace the intermediated one.
The company’s regulatory history supplies context the announcement leaves out. Beyond the US settlement, Bulgarian prosecutors raided Nexo’s Sofia offices in January 2023, charged four co-founders, then dropped the entire case in December 2023 for lack of evidence — prompting Nexo to file a $3 billion ICSID arbitration claim against Bulgaria for a politically motivated investigation it says destroyed an $8–12 billion US listing. A company with that biography has rational reasons to prefer a structure in which the license risk sits with partners whose regulatory standing is uncontroversial, and equally rational reasons to headline the word “compliance” before anyone else headlines its absence.
Whether the model holds is now a supervisory question rather than a legal one. European regulators spent the first MiCA year warning about structures in which an EU-licensed entity fronts a global platform whose economics, products and decision-making sit offshore — and a top-three lender operating through rented German rails while its flagship products sit outside the regulatory perimeter is the most prominent test of that concern to date. The deeper exposure, though, runs the other way. Nexo’s European legality is drawn precisely along the current borders of MiCA’s map, and those borders are scheduled for redrawing: the moment Brussels extends the framework to crypto lending — the gap its own supervisors keep flagging — the products this compliance model so elegantly routes around become licensable activities, and the question of who in this arrangement holds a license stops being rhetorical.